273
umfriendly
act and an
unfair impediment Trade,
to the legitimate operations of
well as
contrary
introduced
to the spirit of the Treaty
I therefore treat that stipulations may
be
rendering the withholding of the purmision contemplated by the Treaty imposible unless for exceptional and
H-
sufficient
reasons,
to be communicated
to the bansul.
31.
The
second point to which I would
draw attention is the necefsity for always leansing open an appeal to higher authority
in the case
repels or Cargo confiscated
under the Greaty. At present under the Artistes made in 1865 by MC: Wade and Prince King, if the banoul and Superintendent
confiscation in the first
as to the confiscation
agree as
agree
bax Memrat
Bath 39-40.41
motance, all night to appeal is concluded,
and in the recent case
of the Prince
Albert seized and confiscated, have sheum, most impuotly.
merits and illegally in the
CLO
I
on the
in the opinion of
the Attorney General according to the
all right of Appeal was estopped
Treaty,
by the bonauto not exprefsing defent
in the first stage.
Thus the case
passed beyond the power of Her
{
finally
th
<チャー
Marjisty's Government to afford any
I would therefore suppest
adequate redress. I
not
merely a revision of those Articles of Mr. Wade, but
a clearer
definition of
what constitutes confiscation under XIVI!!,
to be attached
and what is
}
the
meaning
to the phrase "resorting to other Ports
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.